Vol. I · No. 22 Price: One Tinfoil Hat

“All the News That’s Unfit to Believe”

FROM THE BOARDS

Montauk Project Resurfaces on /x/, Drawing Timelines, Skeptics and a Flooding Complaint

An anonymous thread on the Long Island time-travel legend sets reading lists against remarks about the water table.

Strangeness 3 of 5

An anonymous poster on 4chan's /x/ board has reopened one of the more durable legends of American conspiracy lore, the Montauk Project, and drawn 26 replies so far. The opening post says the matter was "discovered by accident through ufo researchers."

The post summarizes the theory as alleging a series of United States government projects at Camp Hero, or Montauk Air Force Station, in New York. Their purpose, according to the legend, was psychological warfare techniques and exotic research including time travel. It adds that the story originated in the books of Preston Nichols, who blended it with accounts of the Bulgarian Experiment.

Respondents came ready with material. One offered a self-authored reading list and a photo gallery of the structures. Another posted a long timeline said to run from 1931 to the 1980s, naming Nikola Tesla, Albert Einstein and the Philadelphia Experiment, and claiming that large numbers of children were taken and programmed. These are the claims of the replies, and the thread offers no evidence for them. A further reply summarized the tale as resembling the plot of the television series Stranger Things.

Skepticism arrived promptly. One local resident argued that the water table around Montauk is high, so any deep underground installation would flood constantly. Another declined to read what he called fan fiction. A third visitor reported that the base is small but sits on a rocky overlook, and noted that the New York area holds many abandoned military sites and old tunnels.

The witnesses themselves drew divided verdicts. Some posters doubted Nichols while believing a program existed. Others called Al Bielek, a figure tied to the Philadelphia Experiment story, unreliable, though one said he sounded technically knowledgeable. One quoted passage even alleged that several leading figures in the field were disinformation agents. The thread reached no consensus, and the tunnels, if any, remain unflooded in the record.

More from the Thursday, October 29, 2026 Edition